Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Updated October 21, 2026. 3 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$1.00
0
Qwen3 Coder NextQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
9.2
Output $/M
$0.80
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has the edge where what matters is AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
32
Qwen3 Coder Next only
8
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Next not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 19.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 41.7% against Qwen3 Coder Next 73.7%, 32.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 against Qwen3 Coder Next $0.80 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Qwen3 Coder Next 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructBarsQwen3 Coder NextTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Aider polyglot16.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured36.2Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.2%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
WeirdMLNot measured34.4%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
LMArena Text: coding1276Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1261Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.79.2Qwen3 Coder Next
Epoch Capabilities Index119.5Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.9Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured79.5%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)41.7%73.7%Qwen3 Coder Next
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.5%10.1%Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text: hard prompts1251Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1221Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1269Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
GSM8K93.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1251Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1243Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)63.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
MMLU79.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge70.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1221Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1187Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1257Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1224Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
IFBenchNot measured35.2%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured47.0%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
HellaSwag83.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrande80.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1230Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1223Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1174Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1248Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1205Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1222Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1228Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1222Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1251Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1191Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1150Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0084Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.032Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next
SpecificationQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Coder Next
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 11, 2024February 4, 2026
Context window33K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.12
Output $/Mtok$1.00$0.80
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder Next for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has the edge where what matters is AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12 and $0.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder Next's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next