Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs 1.3x less per output token than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.30 vs $0.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $0.40 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is 1.3x cheaper.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Voxtral Small 24B 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and WeirdML; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 against Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 33K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)27.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WeirdML16.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding1292Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1292Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.7Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index129.0Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom34.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
METR time horizons35.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BALROG16.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany5.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BIG-Bench Hard79.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1271Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1245Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1279Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
AA Math Index14.0Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME8.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
MATH level 563.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1283Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1290Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)72.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
MMLU85.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge94.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1275Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1258Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1288Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1253Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
IFBench36.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
DTBench62.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMCA13.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
HellaSwag84.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrande82.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQA82.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1269Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1254Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1221Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1283Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1252Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1273Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1234Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1180Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1188Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1280Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1255Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1264Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1272Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1281Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1247Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1211Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.0003Fits in one request

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.0059Exceeds the context window

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.023Exceeds the context window

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
SpecificationQwen2.5 72B InstructMistral Voxtral Small 24B 2507
MakerQwenMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 19, 2024October 30, 2025
Context window33K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.36$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

Neither: both take 33K tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and WeirdML; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next