Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Hy3
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 1.3x less per output token than Hy3 ($0.40 vs $0.528 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Hy3: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.528 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 29
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
- 24
- Hy3 only
- 15
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has a AA Intelligence Index result, 7.7.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Hy3 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1230.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Hy3
Hy3 takes 262K tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Hy3
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.0006, Hy3 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 33.0 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 49.1% against Hy3 89.7%, 40.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
- Context window
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Hy3 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Bars | Hy3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 5 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 16 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 29 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1507 | Only Hy3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 27.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 48.6% | Only Hy3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| WeirdML | 16.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 838.6 | Only Hy3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1292 | 1466 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1292 | 1463 | Hy3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1511 | Only Hy3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1487 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.7 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.0 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 34.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| METR time horizons | 35.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| BALROG | 16.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| TheAgentCompany | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 49.1% | 89.7% | Hy3 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.6% | 33.5% | Hy3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 49.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1271 | 1447 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1245 | 1461 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1279 | 1455 | Hy3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 14.0 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 8.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| MATH level 5 | 63.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1283 | 1473 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1290 | 1482 | Hy3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 72.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| MMLU | 85.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| AI2 Reasoning Challenge | 94.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1275 | 1457 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1258 | 1452 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1288 | 1422 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1253 | 1424 | Hy3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1230 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1204 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1208 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1164 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1232 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1227 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1200 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1152 | Only Hy3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 36.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 79.0% | Only Hy3 measured |
| DTBench | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMCA | 13.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| HellaSwag | 84.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| WinoGrande | 82.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| PIQA | 82.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text | 1269 | 1438 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1254 | 1426 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1221 | 1403 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1283 | 1448 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1252 | 1426 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1273 | 1485 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1234 | 1449 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1180 | 1397 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1188 | 1396 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1280 | 1456 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1255 | 1457 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1264 | 1432 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1447 | Only Hy3 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1272 | 1436 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1281 | 1442 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1247 | 1414 | Hy3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1211 | 1400 | Hy3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Hy3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Hy3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Hy3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Hy3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Tencent Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | Tencent |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | September 19, 2024 | July 6, 2026 |
| Context window | 33K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.36 | $0.132 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $0.528 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Hy3 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.528 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Hy3?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Hy3?
Hy3, with 262K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks is the Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Hy3 comparison based on?
29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.