Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Extract
Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- 7.7
- Output $/M
- $0.40
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- No data
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Extract: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and WeirdML; Extract has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has a AA Intelligence Index result, 7.7.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Extract
Extract takes 1M tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Extract
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.0006, Extract $0.0000 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked, Extract not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 against Extract Free per million output tokens.
- Context window
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Extract 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Extract | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 27.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| WeirdML | 16.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1292 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1292 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Extract | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.7 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.0 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Extract | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 34.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| METR time horizons | 35.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| BALROG | 16.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| TheAgentCompany | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Extract | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 49.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 49.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1271 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1245 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1279 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Extract | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 14.0 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 8.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| MATH level 5 | 63.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1283 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1290 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Extract | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 72.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| MMLU | 85.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| AI2 Reasoning Challenge | 94.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1275 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1258 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1288 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1253 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards measured
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | Extract | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 36.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| DTBench | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMCA | 13.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| HellaSwag | 84.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| WinoGrande | 82.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| PIQA | 82.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text | 1269 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1254 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1221 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1283 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1252 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1273 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1234 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1180 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1188 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1280 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1255 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1264 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1272 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1281 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1247 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1211 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Extract costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Extract costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Extract costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | ScaleDown Extract |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | Scaledown |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 19, 2024 | October 13, 2026 |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.36 | $0.04 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | Free |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Extract for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Extract?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Extract costs $0.04 and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Extract?
Extract, with 1M tokens against 33K.
Has any benchmark tested both Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Extract?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and WeirdML; Extract has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.