Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 leads Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.0 to 7.7, and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 1.9x less per output token ($0.40 vs $0.775 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
13
vs boards won of 13 shared

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.775 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
13
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
40
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
11
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 77.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 14.0 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 91.0, 77.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen2.5 72B InstructBarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General03
All shared boards013
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)27.6%78.8%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SciCodeNot measured41.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%15.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
WeirdML16.0%38.7%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: coding1292Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1292Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.712.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Epoch Capabilities Index129.0Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom34.5%53.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
METR time horizons35.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BALROG16.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany5.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured52.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.1%79.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%15.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
ARC-AGINot measured11.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured1.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
BIG-Bench Hard79.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1271Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1245Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1279Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math Index14.091.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%91.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
OTIS Mock AIME8.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
MATH level 563.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1283Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1290Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)72.0%84.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MMLU85.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge94.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1275Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1258Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1288Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1253Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1058Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured963Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured951Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1070Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured994Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1038Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
General benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench36.9%51.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
DTBench62.9%78.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMCA13.4%23.5%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
HellaSwag84.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrande82.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQA82.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1269Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1254Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1221Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1283Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1252Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1273Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1234Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1180Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1188Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1280Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1255Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1264Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1272Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1281Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1247Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1211Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 19, 2024July 21, 2025
Context window33K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.36$0.145
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.775
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.775 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 and $0.775. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next