Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Sonar Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B tie on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 7.6, and Qwen3 30B A3B costs 30.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Sonar ProPerplexity
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
1
Qwen3 30B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$0.50
3
vs boards won of 5 shared, 1 tied

Sonar Pro or Qwen3 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Sonar Pro for a larger context window (200K against 41K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
5
Sonar Pro only
0
Qwen3 30B A3B only
47
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Sonar Pro not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 23.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): Sonar Pro 27.5% against Qwen3 30B A3B 50.6%, 23.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Sonar Pro $15.00 against Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
Context window
Sonar Pro takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategorySonar ProBarsQwen3 30B A3BTies
Coding01
Intelligence001 tie
Reasoning11
Knowledge01
All shared boards131 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)27.5%50.6%Qwen3 30B A3B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
WeirdMLNot measured29.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1337Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1340Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Intelligence benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.67.6Tie
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured137.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.8%61.6%Qwen3 30B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.6%6.2%Sonar Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured61.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1329Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured72.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured62.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1355Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1363Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.5%77.7%Qwen3 30B A3B
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1321Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1318Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1314Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1309Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured955Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured946Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured899Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured967Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured942Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured41.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
DTBenchNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMCANot measured15.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured40.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1283Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1271Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1335Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1295Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1347Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1307Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1254Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1261Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1352Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1291Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1299Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1307Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1312Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1290Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1258Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkSonar ProQwen3 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Sonar Pro$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Sonar Pro$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0075Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Sonar Pro$0.750Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.029Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Sonar Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B
SpecificationPerplexity Sonar ProQwen3 30B A3B
MakerPerplexityQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 7, 2025April 28, 2025
Context window200K41K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.12
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Sonar Pro better than Qwen3 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Sonar Pro for a larger context window (200K against 41K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Sonar Pro or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Sonar Pro costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Sonar Pro or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Sonar Pro, with 200K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the Sonar Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Sonar Pro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next