Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

o3 Pro leads Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.9 to 9.5, and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs 80.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $80.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace o3 Pro Replace Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
o3 ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$80.00
1
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

o3 Pro or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Model Ao3 ProOpenAINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
1
o3 Pro only
11
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking only
0
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 Pro not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 12.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: o3 Pro 21.9 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking 9.5, 12.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 Pro $80.00 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking $1.00 per million output tokens, 80.0x apart.
Context window
o3 Pro takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3 ProBarsQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Aider polyglot84.9%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
WeirdML58.2%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.99.5o3 Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index147.3Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
ARC-AGI59.3%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
ARC-AGI-24.9%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.1%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 18 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
DTBench86.9%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
LMCA38.5%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
Fiction.LiveBench97.2%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.4%Not measuredOnly o3 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Benchmarko3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3 Pro$0.060Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3 Pro$1.24Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.018Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3 Pro$4.80Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.068Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
SpecificationOpenAI o3 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 10, 2025October 6, 2025
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$20.00$0.29
Output $/Mtok$80.00$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 Pro better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, o3 Pro or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

o3 Pro costs $20.00 per million input tokens and $80.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.29 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 Pro or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. o3 Pro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next