Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.2 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 2.2x less per output token ($0.45 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
2
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
9
vs boards won of 11 shared

Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.45 vs $1.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
11
Nemotron 3 Super only
28
Qwen3.6 35B A3B only
9
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 19.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nemotron 3 Super 67.8% against Qwen3.6 35B A3B 95.3%, 27.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 SuperBarsQwen3.6 35B A3BTies
Coding13
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning02
General11
All shared boards29
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Coding Index37.741.9Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SciCode36.2%36.6%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%34.8%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Terminal-BenchNot measured24.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
WeirdML38.0%34.5%Nemotron 3 Super
ALE-Bench213.9Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: coding1403Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1409Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.818.2Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.7Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.713.1Qwen3.6 35B A3B
τ²-Bench Telecom67.8%95.3%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.0%84.1%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.8%22.2%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1386Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: expert1398Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1397Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1380Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1405Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
MathArena16.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
LMArena Text: science1387Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1383Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1392Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1364Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
IFBench71.5%64.4%Nemotron 3 Super
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%71.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
DTBenchNot measured73.9%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMCANot measured29.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured44.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text1378Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1347Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1317Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: English1400Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: non-English1356Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1431Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: German1341Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: French1403Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1418Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: Russian1336Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: Polish1346Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1369Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1362Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1332Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1336Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 11, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.085$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.45$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.45 vs $1.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 35B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next