Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.4 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 5.2x less per output token ($0.45 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
0
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.2
Output $/M
$2.34
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($0.45 vs $2.34 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
36
Nemotron 3 Super only
3
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
30
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 27.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nemotron 3 Super 67.8% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 95.6%, 27.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 5.2x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 SuperBarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math03
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
AA Coding Index37.7Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
SciCode36.2%44.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%40.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
WeirdML38.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-Bench213.9621.9Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: coding14041465Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: software and IT14091463Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1388Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1409Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.821.4Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.8Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.7Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom67.8%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
APEX-AgentsNot measured24.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.0%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.8%29.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.4%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13861448Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: expert13981462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13971450Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: math13801454Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14051454Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MathArena16.6%19.2%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena Text: science13881457Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13831455Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: legal and government13921441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: business and finance13641435Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1190Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1161Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1140Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1175Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1162Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1179Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
IFBench71.5%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
DTBenchNot measured87.5%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCANot measured37.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text13781438Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: instruction following13471423Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: creative writing13171402Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English14001443Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: non-English13561430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Chinese14321499Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: German13411444Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1385Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: French14031462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Spanish14181441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Russian13361430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Polish13461448Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: multi-turn13691447Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: longer queries13621441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: writing and language13311416Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13361399Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 SuperQwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 11, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.085$0.39
Output $/Mtok$0.45$2.34
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($0.45 vs $2.34 per million) and work measured by SciCode or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next