Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Nemotron 3 Super leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.8 to 6.7, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 2.2x less per output token ($0.45 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
25
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 25 shared

Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.45 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 33K tokens).

Shared results
25
Nemotron 3 Super only
13
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
10
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 26.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Nemotron 3 Super 80.0% against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 41.7%, 38.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3 Super takes 262K tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 SuperBarsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General110
All shared boards250
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured16.4%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured47.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AA Coding Index37.7Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SciCode36.2%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
WeirdML38.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-Bench213.9Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: coding14031276Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: software and IT14091261Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.86.7Nemotron 3 Super
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured119.5Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index1.7Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom67.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.0%41.7%Nemotron 3 Super
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.8%3.5%Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts13861251Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: expert13981221Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13971269Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GSM8KNot measured93.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math13801251Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: mathematical work14051243Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured63.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
MMLUNot measured79.1%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured70.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science13871221Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13831187Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: legal and government13921257Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: business and finance13641224Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
IFBench71.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
HellaSwagNot measured83.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured80.8%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text13781230Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: instruction following13471223Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: creative writing13171174Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: English14001248Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: non-English13561205Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Chinese14311222Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: German1341Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: French1403Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1418Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: Russian13361228Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Polish1346Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13691222Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: longer queries13621251Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: writing and language13321191Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13361150Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 SuperQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 11, 2026November 11, 2024
Context window262K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.085$0.66
Output $/Mtok$0.45$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.45 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next