Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads Hermes 3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.2 to 6.7, and Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs 1.4x less per output token ($0.70 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

N Hermes 3 70B InstructNous Research
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.70
0
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hermes 3 70B Instruct for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.70 vs $1.00 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
Hermes 3 70B Instruct only
2
Qwen3.6 35B A3B only
17
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hermes 3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 31.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Hermes 3 70B Instruct 40.1% against Qwen3.6 35B A3B 84.1%, 44.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.70 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Hermes 3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryHermes 3 70B InstructBarsQwen3.6 35B A3BTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured41.9Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%Not measuredOnly Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured36.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured24.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
WeirdMLNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.718.2Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.7Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured13.1Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.3%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)40.1%84.1%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%22.2%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%Not measuredOnly Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured64.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured71.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
DTBenchNot measured73.9%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMCANot measured29.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured44.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.037Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.147Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationNous Hermes 3 70B InstructQwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerNous ResearchQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 18, 2024April 27, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.70$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.70$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hermes 3 70B Instruct better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hermes 3 70B Instruct for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.70 vs $1.00 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Hermes 3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 35B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next