Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs 1.8x less per output token than Qwen3.6 35B A3B ($0.555 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $0.555 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 1.8x cheaper.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Small 3.1 24B for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($0.555 vs $1.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mistral Small 3.1 24B has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; Qwen3.6 35B A3B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured41.9Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
SciCodeNot measured36.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured24.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
WeirdMLNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1309Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1301Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured18.2Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.7Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured13.1Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.3%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.1%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured22.2%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1278Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: expert1257Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1290Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1119Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1158Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1261Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1271Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
LMArena Text: science1265Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1267Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1271Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1257Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards measured
General benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured64.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured71.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
DTBenchNot measured73.9%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMCANot measured29.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured44.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text1277Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1263Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision1136Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: English1295Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1255Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1253Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: German1266Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1208Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1207Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: French1273Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1284Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1263Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1242Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1270Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1299Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1268Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1250Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: English1157Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1155Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1132Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1142Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1153Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1155Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1123Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 17, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.351$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.555$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Small 3.1 24B for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($0.555 vs $1.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 per million input tokens and $0.555 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mistral Small 3.1 24B has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; Qwen3.6 35B A3B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next