Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Mistral Small 4 leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.3 to 6.7, and Mistral Small 4 costs 1.7x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Small 4Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
3
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Mistral Small 4 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Small 4 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 33K tokens).

Shared results
3
Mistral Small 4 only
12
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
32
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Small 4 not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 20.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Mistral Small 4 76.9% against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 41.7%, 35.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Small 4 $0.60 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Mistral Small 4 takes 262K tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Small 4BarsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured16.4%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured47.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AA Coding Index26.6Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SciCode38.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)17.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
ALE-Bench497.6Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1276Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1261Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.36.7Mistral Small 4
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured119.5Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index0.8Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom41.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.9%41.7%Mistral Small 4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.9%3.5%Mistral Small 4
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1221Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1269Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GSM8KNot measured93.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1243Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured63.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
MMLUNot measured79.1%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured70.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1221Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1187Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1257Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1224Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
IFBench48.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
DTBench70.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
LMCA20.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 4 measured
HellaSwagNot measured83.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured80.8%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena TextNot measured1230Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1223Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1174Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1248Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1205Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1222Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1228Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1222Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1191Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1150Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Small 4$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Small 4$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Small 4$0.036Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
SpecificationMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 16, 2026November 11, 2024
Context window262K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.66
Output $/Mtok$0.60$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Small 4 better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Small 4 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 4 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Small 4 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Mistral Small 4, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Small 4's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next