Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct tie on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 6.7, and Mistral Small 3 costs 12.5x less per output token ($0.08 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Small 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.08
10
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
16
vs boards won of 27 shared, 1 tied

Mistral Small 3 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Small 3 for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $1.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
27
Mistral Small 3 only
9
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
8
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Small 3 not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 3.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: legal and government: Mistral Small 3 1219 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 1257, 6.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Small 3 $0.08 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
Context window
Both take 33K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Small 3BarsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTies
Coding03
Intelligence001 tie
Reasoning23
Math02
Knowledge32
General56
All shared boards10161 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured16.4%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured47.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)25.2%29.5%Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: coding12461276Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT12481261Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.76.7Tie
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured119.5Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom19.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%41.7%Mistral Small 3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%3.5%Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text: hard prompts12331251Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert12021221Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12431269Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Math Index4.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
GSM8KNot measured93.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12401251Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12431243Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)65.2%63.5%Mistral Small 3
MMLUNot measured79.1%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured70.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12351221Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12151187Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text: legal and government12191257Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance12051224Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index56
General benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
IFBench26.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
HellaSwagNot measured83.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured80.8%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12341230Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text: instruction following12141223Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing11941174Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text: English12561248Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text: non-English11981205Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese12041222Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: German1211Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1111Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1188Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: French1204Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian12161228Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn12171222Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries12461251Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language12141191Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11841150Mistral Small 3
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Small 3$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Small 3$0.0027Exceeds the context window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Small 3$0.011Exceeds the context window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
SpecificationMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 30, 2025November 11, 2024
Context window33K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.66
Output $/Mtok$0.08$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Small 3 for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $1.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3 costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Small 3 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Neither: both take 33K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Small 3's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next