Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3 vs Extract

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
9.0
Output $/M
$2.00
S ExtractScaledown
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 131K vs 1M context window. Extract fits 7.6x more.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mistral Medium 3 has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding; Extract has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked, Extract not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 against Extract Free per million output tokens.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3 takes 131K tokens, Extract 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3ExtractLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: coding1385Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1385Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3ExtractLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index134.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3ExtractLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom24.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3ExtractLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1364Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1342Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1374Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1155Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1165Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3ExtractLeader
AA Math Index30.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)30.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: math1353Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1354Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3ExtractLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: science1381Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1381Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1352Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3ExtractLeader
Design Arena: websites1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1024Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1018Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1034Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1083Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1069Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28 boards measured
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3ExtractLeader
IFBench39.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)31.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
DTBench62.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text1370Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1338Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1343Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision1157Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: English1385Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1353Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1374Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1316Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1304Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: French1368Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1364Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1359Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1371Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1360Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1352Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1335Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1172Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1161Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1154Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1094Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1141Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1146Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request
Extract$0.0000Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request
Extract$0.0020Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window
Extract$0.0080Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3 and Extract
SpecificationMistral Medium 3ScaleDown Extract
MakerMistral AIScaledown
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 7, 2025October 13, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.04
Output $/Mtok$2.00Free
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3 better than Extract for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3 or Extract?

Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Extract costs $0.04 and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3 or Extract?

Extract, with 1M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Mistral Medium 3 and Extract?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mistral Medium 3 has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding; Extract has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next