Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3 vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super leads Mistral Medium 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.8 to 9.0, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 4.4x less per output token ($0.45 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
6
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
27
vs boards won of 33 shared

Mistral Medium 3 or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3 for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
33
Mistral Medium 3 only
24
Nemotron 3 Super only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 43.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Mistral Medium 3 24.3% against Nemotron 3 Super 67.8%, 43.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3 takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3BarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General611
All shared boards627
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%28.8%Nemotron 3 Super
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-BenchNot measured213.9Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: coding13851403Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: software and IT13851409Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.012.8Nemotron 3 Super
Epoch Capabilities Index134.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom24.3%67.8%Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.8%80.0%Nemotron 3 Super
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.1%20.8%Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts13641386Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: expert13421398Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13741397Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Vision: diagrams1155Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1165Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Math Index30.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)30.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: math13531380Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: mathematical work13541405Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: science13811387Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13811383Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: legal and government13841392Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: business and finance13521364Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1022Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1017Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1034Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1083Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1068Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index611
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBench39.3%71.5%Nemotron 3 Super
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)31.3%65.7%Nemotron 3 Super
DTBench62.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text13701378Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: instruction following13381347Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: creative writing13431317Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Vision1157Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: English13851400Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: non-English13531356Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Chinese13741431Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: German13771341Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: Japanese1316Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1304Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: French13681403Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Spanish13641418Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Russian13591336Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: Polish13711346Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: multi-turn13841369Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: longer queries13601362Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: writing and language13521332Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13351336Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Vision: English1172Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1161Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1154Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1094Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1141Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1146Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationMistral Medium 3NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerMistral AINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 7, 2025March 11, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.085
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3 better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3 for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3 vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Medium 3's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next