Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Qwen3 14B

Qwen3 14B leads Ministral 3 3B 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 6.7 to 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs 2.3x less per output token ($0.10 vs $0.23 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ministral 3 3B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.10
0
Qwen3 14BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

Ministral 3 3B 2512 or Qwen3 14B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ministral 3 3B 2512 for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.10 vs $0.23 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 41K tokens).

Shared results
1
Ministral 3 3B 2512 only
6
Qwen3 14B only
19
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ministral 3 3B 2512 not benchmarked, Qwen3 14B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 1.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Ministral 3 3B 2512 4.8 against Qwen3 14B 6.7, 1.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ministral 3 3B 2512 $0.10 against Qwen3 14B $0.23 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Ministral 3 3B 2512 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 14B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMinistral 3 3B 2512BarsQwen3 14BTies
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
AA Coding Index4.8Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured52.3%Only Qwen3 14B measured
SciCodeNot measured30.7%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured5.3%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
AA Intelligence Index4.86.7Qwen3 14B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured138.2Only Qwen3 14B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
AA Agentic Index0.8Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured60.4%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.5%Only Qwen3 14B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured63.8%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured49.1%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured58.0Only Qwen3 14B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured66.4%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.4%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
Design Arena: websites1027Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: game dev948Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3D962Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1009Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
IFBenchNot measured40.5%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
DTBenchNot measured64.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
LMCANot measured18.2%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured62.5%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0002Fits in one request

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.0053Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0062Exceeds the context window

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.021Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 14B$0.024Exceeds the context window

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ministral 3 3B 2512 and Qwen3 14B
SpecificationMistral Ministral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 14B
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025April 28, 2025
Context window131K41K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.11
Output $/Mtok$0.10$0.23
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ministral 3 3B 2512 better than Qwen3 14B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ministral 3 3B 2512 for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.10 vs $0.23 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 41K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B 2512 or Qwen3 14B?

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B costs $0.11 and $0.23. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ministral 3 3B 2512 or Qwen3 14B?

Ministral 3 3B 2512, with 131K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Qwen3 14B comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Ministral 3 3B 2512's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 14B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next