Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash costs 1.5x less per output token than Ministral 3 14B 2512 ($0.13 vs $0.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.20
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.13
Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Qwen3.7 Flash: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; Qwen3.7 Flash on ALE-Bench, Epoch Capabilities Index and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 6.0.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.1.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1081.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash takes 1M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash
Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.0003, Qwen3.7 Flash $0.0001 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 against Qwen3.7 Flash $0.13 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
- Context window
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.7 Flash 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 14.4 | Not measured | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 420.1 | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.0 | Not measured | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 144.1 | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.1 | Not measured | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 82.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 15.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 86.7% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 19.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1081 | Not measured | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1037 | Not measured | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 989 | Not measured | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1064 | Not measured | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Mistral Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 2, 2025 | July 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.20 | $0.03 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.20 | $0.13 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ministral 3 14B 2512 better than Qwen3.7 Flash for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03 and $0.13. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash, with 1M tokens against 262K.
Has any benchmark tested both Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; Qwen3.7 Flash on ALE-Bench, Epoch Capabilities Index and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.