Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs 11.0x less per output token than MiniMax M1 ($0.20 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
Qwen2.5 7B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $2.20 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 11.0x cheaper.

MiniMax M1 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 33K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax M1 has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and AA Intelligence Index; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct on Epoch Capabilities Index, BALROG and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against Qwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.20 per million output tokens, 11.0x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen2.5 7B InstructLeader
LMArena Text: coding1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen2.5 7B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.7Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured118.5Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen2.5 7B InstructLeader
BALROGNot measured7.8%Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen2.5 7B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured35.5%Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1339Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1317Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen2.5 7B InstructLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured2.5%Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen2.5 7B InstructLeader
MMLUNot measured72.9%Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1354Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1355Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1337Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen2.5 7B InstructLeader
DTBenchNot measured47.7%Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct measured
LMCANot measured6.4%Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1343Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1312Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1297Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: English1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1360Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1217Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: French1370Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1335Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1326Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1303Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct$0.0056Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct$0.022Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
SpecificationMiniMax M1Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025October 16, 2024
Context window1M33K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.10
Output $/Mtok$2.20$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.10 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 33K.

Has any benchmark tested both MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax M1 has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and AA Intelligence Index; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct on Epoch Capabilities Index, BALROG and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next