Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs Mistral Medium 3

MiniMax M1 leads Mistral Medium 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.7 to 9.0, at about the same output price ($2.20 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
4
Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
25
vs boards won of 29 shared

MiniMax M1 or Mistral Medium 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 131K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
29
MiniMax M1 only
0
Mistral Medium 3 only
28
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 5.6 points apart on average over 17 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Japanese: MiniMax M1 1217 against Mistral Medium 3 1316, 16.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, Mistral Medium 3 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M1BarsMistral Medium 3Ties
Coding02
Intelligence10
Reasoning03
Math20
Knowledge04
General116
All shared boards425
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.0%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: coding13591385Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: software and IT13591385Mistral Medium 3
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.79.0MiniMax M1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured134.0Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured24.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.8%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.1%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13391364Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: expert13171342Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531374Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1155Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured30.3Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: math13611353MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: mathematical work13631354MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.0%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: science13541381Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13551381Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: legal and government13371384Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: business and finance13191352Mistral Medium 3
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1079Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1024Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1018Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1034Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1084Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1069Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index116
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
IFBenchNot measured39.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured31.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
DTBenchNot measured62.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text13431370Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: instruction following13121338Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: creative writing12971343Mistral Medium 3
LMArena VisionNot measured1157Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: English13631385Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: non-English13191353Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: Chinese13601374Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: German13501377Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: Japanese12171316Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: Korean12661304Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: French13701368MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: Spanish13531364Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: Russian13291359Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: Polish13291371Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: multi-turn13351384Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: longer queries13261360Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: writing and language13111352Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13031335Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1161Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1154Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1094Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1146Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and Mistral Medium 3
SpecificationMiniMax M1Mistral Medium 3
MakerMiniMaxMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 17, 2025May 7, 2025
Context window1M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.40
Output $/Mtok$2.20$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Mistral Medium 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 131K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Mistral Medium 3?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or Mistral Medium 3?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M1 vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. MiniMax M1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next