Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Phi 4 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads Phi 4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.9 to 5.9, and Phi 4 costs 13.6x less per output token ($0.14 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.14
0
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
38
vs boards won of 38 shared

Phi 4 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Phi 4 for output tokens 13.6x cheaper ($0.14 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
38
Phi 4 only
8
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
11
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Phi 4 not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 54.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Phi 4 18.0% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 88.3%, 70.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Phi 4 $0.14 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 13.6x apart.
Context window
Phi 4 takes 16K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryPhi 4BarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge05
General018
All shared boards038
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.1%64.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%11.4%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: coding12311438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT12281442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.99.9Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index130.5Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom0.0%54.1%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BALROG11.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.5%77.2%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%11.9%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)56.1%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12201428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert12031442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12301439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math Index18.088.3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)18.0%88.3%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME13.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
MATH level 564.9%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: math12461425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12541419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.4%83.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MMLU84.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: science12061444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12021431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government12411438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance11991433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench23.5%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%63.7%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text12171420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following12011406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing11811366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English12311429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English11971405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese12121463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German12221424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese11581385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean11511394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French12241452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish12341428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian12091408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12061428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries12171419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language11981392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11621368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Phi 4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationMicrosoft Phi 4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerMicrosoftQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 10, 2025September 23, 2025
Context window16K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.07$0.21
Output $/Mtok$0.14$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Phi 4 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Phi 4 for output tokens 13.6x cheaper ($0.14 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Phi 4 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Phi 4 costs $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Phi 4 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the Phi 4 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Phi 4's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next