Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Phi 4 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Phi 4 costs 11.1x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 ($0.14 vs $1.56 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
vs $0.14 vs $1.56 per 1M output tokens. Phi 4 is 11.1x cheaper.

Phi 4 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Phi 4 for output tokens 11.1x cheaper ($0.14 vs $1.56 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Phi 4 has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Phi 4 not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Phi 4 $0.14 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 $1.56 per million output tokens, 11.1x apart.
Context window
Phi 4 takes 16K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.1%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding1231Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1228Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.9Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index130.5Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom0.0%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
BALROG11.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.5%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)56.1%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1220Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1203Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1230Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
AA Math Index18.0Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)18.0%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME13.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
MATH level 564.9%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: math1246Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1254Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.4%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
MMLU84.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: science1206Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1202Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1241Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1199Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1187Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1178Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1105Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1135Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1119Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1167Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1108Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1094Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
IFBench23.5%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text1217Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1201Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1181Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: English1231Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1197Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1212Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: German1222Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1158Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1151Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: French1224Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1234Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1209Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1206Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1217Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1198Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1162Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.0010Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.018Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.068Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
SpecificationMicrosoft Phi 4Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
MakerMicrosoftQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 10, 2025February 16, 2026
Context window16K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.07$0.26
Output $/Mtok$0.14$1.56
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Phi 4 better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Phi 4 for output tokens 11.1x cheaper ($0.14 vs $1.56 per million).

Which is cheaper, Phi 4 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Phi 4 costs $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.26 and $1.56. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Phi 4 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15, with 1M tokens against 16K.

Has any benchmark tested both Phi 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Phi 4 has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next