Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Phi 4 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 leads Phi 4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.0 to 5.9, and Phi 4 costs 5.4x less per output token ($0.14 vs $0.75 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.14
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
12
vs boards won of 12 shared

Phi 4 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Phi 4 for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.14 vs $0.75 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
12
Phi 4 only
34
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
12
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Phi 4 not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 73.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Phi 4 18.0 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 91.0, 73.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Phi 4 $0.14 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.75 per million output tokens, 5.4x apart.
Context window
Phi 4 takes 16K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryPhi 4BarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General02
All shared boards012
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.1%78.8%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SciCodeNot measured41.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%15.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
WeirdMLNot measured38.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: coding1231Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1228Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.912.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Epoch Capabilities Index130.5Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom0.0%53.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BALROG11.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.8%52.1%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.5%79.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%15.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)56.1%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
ARC-AGINot measured11.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured1.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1220Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1203Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1230Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math Index18.091.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)18.0%91.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
OTIS Mock AIME13.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
MATH level 564.9%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: math1246Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1254Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.4%84.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MMLU84.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: science1206Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1202Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1241Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1199Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1058Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured965Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured952Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1069Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured994Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1038Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench23.5%51.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%72.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
DTBenchNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured23.5%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text1217Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1201Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1181Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: English1231Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1197Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1212Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: German1222Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1158Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1151Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: French1224Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1234Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1209Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1206Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1217Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1198Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1162Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0097Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Phi 4 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMicrosoft Phi 4Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerMicrosoftQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 10, 2025July 21, 2025
Context window16K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.07$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.14$0.75
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Phi 4 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Phi 4 for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.14 vs $0.75 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Phi 4 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Phi 4 costs $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.15 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Phi 4 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the Phi 4 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Phi 4's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next