Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Phi 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads Phi 4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 5.9, and Phi 4 costs 3.6x less per output token ($0.14 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.14
0
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Phi 4 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Phi 4 for output tokens 3.6x cheaper ($0.14 vs $0.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
Phi 4 only
43
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
13
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Phi 4 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 69.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Phi 4 0.0% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 69.0%, 69.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Phi 4 $0.14 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
Phi 4 takes 16K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryPhi 4BarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.1%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding1231Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1228Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.926.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Epoch Capabilities Index130.5Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench Telecom0.0%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
BALROG11.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.5%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%30.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)56.1%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1220Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1203Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1230Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Math Index18.0Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)18.0%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME13.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
MATH level 564.9%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: math1246Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1254Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.4%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
MMLU84.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: science1206Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1202Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1241Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1199Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1172Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1143Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1109Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1129Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1156Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBench23.5%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%69.0%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text1217Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1201Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1181Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: English1231Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1197Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1212Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: German1222Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1158Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1151Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: French1224Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1234Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1209Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1206Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1217Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1198Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1162Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkPhi 4Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Phi 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationMicrosoft Phi 4NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerMicrosoftNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 10, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window16K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.07$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.14$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Phi 4 better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Phi 4 for output tokens 3.6x cheaper ($0.14 vs $0.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Phi 4 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Phi 4 costs $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Phi 4 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the Phi 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Phi 4's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next