Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 7.7, and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs 4.9x less per output token ($0.72 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
26.0
Output $/M
$0.72
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
35
vs boards won of 35 shared

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 4.9x cheaper ($0.72 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
35
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct only
17
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
11
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 44.6 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 5.1% against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 86.7%, 81.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.72 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 4.9x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.3 70B InstructBarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Coding04
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge04
General019
All shared boards035
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Coding Index11.922.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
WeirdML14.4%41.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: coding12681424Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: software and IT12731431Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.712.7Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom26.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
BALROG23.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)31.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.4%80.1%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SimpleBench19.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12571416Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: expert12251463Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12771432Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Math Index7.7Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME5.1%86.7%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MATH level 541.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12671412Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: mathematical work12671435Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
MMLU86.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12841433Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751456Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government12841415Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: business and finance12431413Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1052Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured942Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured956Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured950Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured997Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1032Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
IFBench47.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)15.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
DTBench59.5%80.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMCA17.5%29.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%75.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text12741415Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: instruction following12421386Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: creative writing12501384Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: English13031429Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: non-English12361397Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Chinese12171481Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: German12511408Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Japanese11501386Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Korean11421375Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: French1282Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish12691389Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Russian12521401Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Polish12591390Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801406Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: longer queries12551400Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: writing and language12551388Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12411370Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.097Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 6, 2024July 25, 2025
Context window131K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.45$0.45
Output $/Mtok$0.72$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 4.9x cheaper ($0.72 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $0.72 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next