Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 leads Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.0 to 7.7, at about the same output price ($0.775 vs $0.72 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
26.0
Output $/M
$0.72
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
15
vs boards won of 15 shared

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.72 vs $0.775 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
15
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct only
37
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
9
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 83.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 7.7% against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 91.0%, 83.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.72 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.3 70B InstructBarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General04
All shared boards015
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Coding Index11.9Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%78.8%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SciCodeNot measured41.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%15.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
WeirdML14.4%38.7%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: coding1268Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1273Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.712.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom26.6%53.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BALROG23.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)31.9%52.1%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.8%79.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%15.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
ARC-AGINot measured11.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured1.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
SimpleBench19.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1257Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1225Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1277Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math Index7.791.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.7%91.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
OTIS Mock AIME5.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
MATH level 541.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1267Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1267Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.3%84.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MMLU86.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1284Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1275Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1284Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1243Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1058Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured963Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured951Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1070Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured994Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1038Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench47.1%51.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)15.7%72.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
DTBench59.5%78.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMCA17.5%23.5%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1274Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1242Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1250Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1303Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1236Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1217Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1251Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1150Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1142Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1282Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1269Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1252Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Polish1259Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1280Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1255Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1255Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1241Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.097Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 6, 2024July 21, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.45$0.145
Output $/Mtok$0.72$0.775
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.72 vs $0.775 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $0.72 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 and $0.775. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next