Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.3 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 7.5x less per output token ($0.08 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
32
vs boards won of 32 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $0.60 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
32
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
19
Hy3 preview only
4
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 76.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 16.4% against Hy3 preview 92.7%, 76.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsHy3 previewTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General015
All shared boards032
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding Index5.458.8Hy3 preview
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%34.1%Hy3 preview
WeirdML1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding11951421Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: software and IT11951423Hy3 preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.925.3Hy3 preview
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%92.7%Hy3 preview
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)25.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%27.8%Hy3 preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11751413Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: expert11441422Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11961416Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
AA Math Index4.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math11791424Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work11801442Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science11931416Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11821405Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: legal and government12061430Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: business and finance11661397Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
IFBench28.6%63.1%Hy3 preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%64.7%Hy3 preview
DTBench50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMCA5.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text11871401Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: instruction following11591383Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: creative writing11541339Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: English12181409Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: non-English11481390Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Chinese11511435Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: German1144Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1061Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1053Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French11781425Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Spanish11691399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Russian11581399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn11721411Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: longer queries11811402Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: writing and language11621370Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11451352Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Hy3 preview
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructTencent Hy3 preview
MakerMeta LlamaTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024April 22, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.18
Output $/Mtok$0.08$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $0.60 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Hy3 preview?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Hy3 preview?

Hy3 preview, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next