Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.9 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 23.8x less per output token ($0.08 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
38
vs boards won of 38 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 23.8x cheaper ($0.08 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
38
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
13
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
11
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 62.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 4.3 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 88.3, 84.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 23.8x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge05
General018
All shared boards038
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index5.4Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%64.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%11.4%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
WeirdML1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding11951438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT11951442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.99.9Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%54.1%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)25.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%77.2%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%11.9%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11751428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert11441442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11961439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math Index4.388.3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%88.3%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math11791425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work11801419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%83.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science11931444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11821431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government12061438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance11661433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench28.6%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%63.7%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
DTBench50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMCA5.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text11871420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following11591406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing11541366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English12181429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English11481405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese11511463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German11441424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese10611385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean10531394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French11781452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish11691428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian11581408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11721428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries11811419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language11621392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11451368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024September 23, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.21
Output $/Mtok$0.08$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 23.8x cheaper ($0.08 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next