Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Updated October 21, 2026. 39 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
6.9
Output $/M
$0.08
1
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
11.9
Output $/M
$1.50
38
vs boards won of 39 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 18.8x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
39
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
11
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
13
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 34.8 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 11.6% against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 58.5%, 46.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.50 per million output tokens, 18.8x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning14
Math04
Knowledge05
General018
All shared boards138
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1275Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
AA Coding Index5.4Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%58.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%18.9%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
WeirdML1.7%41.2%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
ALE-BenchNot measured461.4Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: coding11951412Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: software and IT11951393Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1257Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1287Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.911.9Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%43.6%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%61.8%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%4.5%Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11751372Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: expert11441338Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11961380Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Math Index4.339.3Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%39.3%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math11791365Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: mathematical work11801367Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%78.8%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science11931347Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11821347Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: legal and government12061358Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: business and finance11661343Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1113Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1099Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1084Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1143Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
IFBench28.6%40.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%45.7%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
DTBench50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMCA5.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text11871357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: instruction following11591355Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: creative writing11541333Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: English12181359Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: non-English11481346Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Chinese11511357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: German11441325Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Japanese10611311Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Korean10531305Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: French11781398Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Spanish11691360Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Russian11581366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1344Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11721366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: longer queries11811378Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: writing and language11621340Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11451317Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0010Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.019Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.075Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024July 23, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.08$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 18.8x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next