Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 6.3x less per output token ($0.08 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($0.08 vs $0.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
48
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
13
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 51.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 18.0% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 69.0%, 51.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
AA Coding Index5.4Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
WeirdML1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding1195Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1195Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.926.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)25.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%30.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1175Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1144Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1196Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Math Index4.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1179Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1180Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1193Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1182Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1206Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1166Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1173Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1149Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1110Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1127Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1155Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%69.0%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
DTBench50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMCA5.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1187Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1159Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1154Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1218Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1148Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1151Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1144Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1061Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1053Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1178Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1169Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1158Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1172Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1181Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1162Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1145Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerMeta LlamaNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024October 15, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.08$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($0.08 vs $0.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next