Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Updated October 21, 2026. 38 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Llama 3.1 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
6.6
Output $/M
$0.56
0
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
11.9
Output $/M
$1.50
37
vs boards won of 38 shared, 1 tied

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 2.7x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
38
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct only
9
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
14
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 28.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 4.0% against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 39.3%, 35.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct $0.56 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.50 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 70B InstructBarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning041 tie
Math04
Knowledge05
General017
All shared boards0371 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1275Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%58.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%18.9%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
WeirdML9.0%41.2%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
ALE-BenchNot measured461.4Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: coding12601412Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: software and IT12601393Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1257Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1287Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.611.9Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Epoch Capabilities Index125.9Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom15.2%43.6%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BALROG27.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany6.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%61.8%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%4.5%Tie
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)44.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12411372Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: expert12091338Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12611380Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Math Index4.039.3Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%39.3%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
OTIS Mock AIME3.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
MATH level 536.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12521365Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12531367Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)67.6%78.8%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MMLU80.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12761347Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12571347Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: legal and government12831358Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: business and finance12351343Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1113Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1099Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1084Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1143Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
IFBench34.4%40.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured45.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
DTBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMCA14.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12611357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: instruction following12311355Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: creative writing12321333Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: English12941359Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: non-English12191346Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Chinese12151357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: German12221325Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Japanese11321311Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Korean11401305Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: French12621398Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Spanish12531360Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Russian12341366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1344Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12561366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: longer queries12411378Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: writing and language12361340Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12301317Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0010Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.030Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.019Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.118Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.075Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024July 23, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.56$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.56$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has the edge where output tokens cost 2.7x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.56 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next