Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Sonar Pro
Sonar Pro leads Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.6 to 6.6, and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs 26.8x less per output token ($0.56 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Sonar Pro: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 26.8x cheaper ($0.56 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 5
- Llama 3.1 70B Instruct only
- 42
- Sonar Pro only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Sonar Pro
Sonar Pro leads, 7.6 against 6.6.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Sonar Pro
Sonar Pro takes 200K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct $0.0008, Sonar Pro $0.011 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Llama 3.1 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Sonar Pro not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 9.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 40.9% against Sonar Pro 57.8%, 16.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Llama 3.1 70B Instruct $0.56 against Sonar Pro $15.00 per million output tokens, 26.8x apart.
- Context window
- Llama 3.1 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Sonar Pro 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Bars | Sonar Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 5 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.2% | 27.5% | Sonar Pro |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| WeirdML | 9.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1260 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1260 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.6 | 7.6 | Sonar Pro |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.9 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 15.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| BALROG | 27.9% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| TheAgentCompany | 6.9% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 40.9% | 57.8% | Sonar Pro |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.5% | 6.6% | Sonar Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 44.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1241 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1209 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1261 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 4.0 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 3.6% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| MATH level 5 | 36.7% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1252 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1253 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 67.6% | 75.5% | Sonar Pro |
| MMLU | 80.1% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1276 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1257 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1283 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1235 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 34.4% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| DTBench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMCA | 14.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text | 1261 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1231 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1232 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1294 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1219 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1215 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1222 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1132 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1140 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1262 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1253 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1234 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1256 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1241 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1236 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1230 | Not measured | Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Perplexity Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta Llama | Perplexity |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 23, 2024 | March 7, 2025 |
| Context window | 131K | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.56 | $3.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.56 | $15.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better than Sonar Pro for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 26.8x cheaper ($0.56 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Sonar Pro?
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.56 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Sonar Pro costs $3.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Sonar Pro?
Sonar Pro, with 200K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Sonar Pro comparison based on?
5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Sonar Pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.