Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 0905 vs Mistral Medium 3

Updated October 21, 2026. 13 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Kimi K2 0905Moonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
15.3
Output $/M
$2.50
13
Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
9.0
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 13 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Kimi K2 0905 has the edge where the context window is larger, 262K against 131K tokens.

Shared results
13
Kimi K2 0905 only
3
Mistral Medium 3 only
44
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 0905 not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 49.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Kimi K2 0905 73.4% against Mistral Medium 3 24.3%, 49.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 0905 $2.50 against Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 0905 takes 262K tokens, Mistral Medium 3 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 0905BarsMistral Medium 3Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Math20
Knowledge10
Web design20
General20
All shared boards130
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)61.0%40.0%Kimi K2 0905
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)23.5%3.8%Kimi K2 0905
WeirdML36.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
ALE-Bench267.1Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.39.0Kimi K2 0905
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured134.0Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom73.4%24.3%Kimi K2 0905
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.7%57.8%Kimi K2 0905
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.4%4.1%Kimi K2 0905
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1364Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1342Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1155Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
AA Math Index57.330.3Kimi K2 0905
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)57.3%30.3%Kimi K2 0905
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1353Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1354Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.9%76.0%Kimi K2 0905
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1381Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1381Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1352Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
Design Arena: websites10891079Kimi K2 0905
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1024Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1018Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1034Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1083Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories10981069Kimi K2 0905
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
IFBench41.7%39.3%Kimi K2 0905
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)53.0%31.3%Kimi K2 0905
DTBenchNot measured62.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1370Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1338Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1343Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1157Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1353Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1377Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1316Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1304Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1368Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1364Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1359Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1371Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1360Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1352Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1335Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1161Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1154Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1094Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1146Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 0905$0.0019Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 0905$0.037Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 0905$0.145Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 0905 and Mistral Medium 3
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0905Mistral Medium 3
MakerMoonshot AIMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 4, 2025May 7, 2025
Context window262K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.40
Output $/Mtok$2.50$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 0905 better than Mistral Medium 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Kimi K2 0905 has the edge where the context window is larger, 262K against 131K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0905 or Mistral Medium 3?

Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 0905 or Mistral Medium 3?

Kimi K2 0905, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 0905 vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2 0905's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next