Ling 3.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3
Ling 3.1 Flash leads Mistral Medium 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 41.1 to 9.0, and Ling 3.1 Flash costs 8.9x less per output token ($0.225 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.
Ling 3.1 Flash or Mistral Medium 3: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Ling 3.1 Flash for output tokens 8.9x cheaper ($0.225 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens).
- Shared results
- 3
- Ling 3.1 Flash only
- 1
- Mistral Medium 3 only
- 54
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash leads, 41.1 against 9.0.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1079.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash takes 262K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash $0.0002, Mistral Medium 3 $0.0014 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ling 3.1 Flash not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- General, 51.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Ling 3.1 Flash 83.0% against Mistral Medium 3 31.3%, 51.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Ling 3.1 Flash $0.225 against Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 per million output tokens, 8.9x apart.
- Context window
- Ling 3.1 Flash takes 262K tokens, Mistral Medium 3 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Ling 3.1 Flash | Bars | Mistral Medium 3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 0 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 40.0% | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| SciCode | 54.1% | Not measured | Only Ling 3.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 3.8% | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1385 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1385 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 41.1 | 9.0 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 134.0 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 24.3% | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 57.8% | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.4% | 4.1% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1364 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1342 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1374 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1155 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1165 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 30.3 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 30.3% | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1353 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1354 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 76.0% | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1381 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1381 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1384 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1352 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1079 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1022 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1017 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1034 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1083 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1068 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | Not measured | 39.3% | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.0% | 31.3% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| DTBench | Not measured | 62.3% | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1370 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1338 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1343 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1157 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1385 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1353 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1374 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1377 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1316 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1304 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1368 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1364 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1359 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1371 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1384 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1360 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1352 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1335 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1172 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1161 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1154 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1145 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1094 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1141 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1146 | Only Mistral Medium 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | inclusionAI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | October 2, 2026 | May 7, 2025 |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.075 | $0.40 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.225 | $2.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ling 3.1 Flash better than Mistral Medium 3 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ling 3.1 Flash for output tokens 8.9x cheaper ($0.225 vs $2.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or Mistral Medium 3?
Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.225 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.1 Flash or Mistral Medium 3?
Ling 3.1 Flash, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Ling 3.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison based on?
3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Ling 3.1 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.