Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads Granite 4.2 8B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.4 to 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B costs 11.7x less per output token ($0.20 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.2
Output $/M
$2.34
25
vs boards won of 25 shared

Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 11.7x cheaper ($0.20 vs $2.34 per million) and work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
25
Granite 4.2 8B only
2
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
41
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 23.1 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Granite 4.2 8B 45.0% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 77.3%, 32.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 11.7x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.2 8B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.2 8BBarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Knowledge04
General012
All shared boards025
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
AA Coding Index22.4Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
SciCode31.5%44.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured621.9Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding13781465Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: software and IT13661463Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1388Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1409Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.121.4Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.8Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.3Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured24.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)63.1%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.7%29.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.4%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13271448Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: expert13861462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13441450Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1454Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1454Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
MathArenaNot measured19.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena Text: science13351457Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13321455Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: legal and government13271441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: business and finance13221435Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1190Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1161Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1140Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1175Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1162Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1179Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
IFBenchNot measured78.8%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
DTBenchNot measured87.5%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCANot measured37.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text13191438Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: instruction following13011423Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: creative writing12351402Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English13371443Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: non-English13001430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Chinese13651499Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1444Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1385Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Russian12801430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1448Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13001447Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: longer queries13241441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: writing and language12691416Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12711399Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.2 8BQwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerIBM GraniteQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 31, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.39
Output $/Mtok$0.20$2.34
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 11.7x cheaper ($0.20 vs $2.34 per million) and work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Granite 4.2 8B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next