Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash costs 15.4x less per output token than Grok Build 0.1 ($0.13 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $2.00
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.13
Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Flash: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
No benchmark has tested both yet. Grok Build 0.1 has results on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and AA Intelligence Index; Qwen3.7 Flash on ALE-Bench, Epoch Capabilities Index and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Grok Build 0.1 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 27.2.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash takes 1M tokens against 256K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash
Grok Build 0.1 $0.0020, Qwen3.7 Flash $0.0001 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Grok Build 0.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Grok Build 0.1 $2.00 against Qwen3.7 Flash $0.13 per million output tokens, 15.4x apart.
- Context window
- Grok Build 0.1 takes 256K tokens, Qwen3.7 Flash 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 51.5 | Not measured | Only Grok Build 0.1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 13.4% | Not measured | Only Grok Build 0.1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 420.1 | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 27.2 | Not measured | Only Grok Build 0.1 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 144.1 | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 82.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 15.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 86.7% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 19.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | SpaceXAI Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | xAI | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | May 20, 2026 | July 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.00 | $0.03 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.13 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen3.7 Flash for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Grok Build 0.1 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03 and $0.13. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash, with 1M tokens against 256K.
Has any benchmark tested both Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Grok Build 0.1 has results on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and AA Intelligence Index; Qwen3.7 Flash on ALE-Bench, Epoch Capabilities Index and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.