Grok Build 0.1 vs Mistral Nemo
Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- 27.2
- Output $/M
- $2.00
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.15
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Grok Build 0.1 has the edge where the context window is larger, 256K against 131K tokens.
No benchmark has tested both yet. Grok Build 0.1 has results on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and AA Intelligence Index; Mistral Nemo on Epoch Capabilities Index, MMLU and DTBench. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Grok Build 0.1 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 27.2.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 takes 256K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
Grok Build 0.1 $0.0020, Mistral Nemo $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Grok Build 0.1 not benchmarked, Mistral Nemo not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Grok Build 0.1 $2.00 against Mistral Nemo $0.15 per million output tokens, 13.3x apart.
- Context window
- Grok Build 0.1 takes 256K tokens, Mistral Nemo 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 51.5 | Not measured | Only Grok Build 0.1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 13.4% | Not measured | Only Grok Build 0.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 27.2 | Not measured | Only Grok Build 0.1 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 118.7 | Only Mistral Nemo measured |
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU | Not measured | 65.3% | Only Mistral Nemo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| DTBench | Not measured | 48.6% | Only Mistral Nemo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Nemo costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Mistral Nemo costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Mistral Nemo costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | SpaceXAI Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | May 20, 2026 | July 19, 2024 |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.00 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.15 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Mistral Nemo for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Grok Build 0.1 has the edge where the context window is larger, 256K against 131K tokens.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Mistral Nemo?
Grok Build 0.1 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo costs $0.15 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Grok Build 0.1 or Mistral Nemo?
Grok Build 0.1, with 256K tokens against 131K.
Has any benchmark tested both Grok Build 0.1 and Mistral Nemo?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Grok Build 0.1 has results on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and AA Intelligence Index; Mistral Nemo on Epoch Capabilities Index, MMLU and DTBench. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.