Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B costs 66.7x less per output token than GPT-6.1 Sol Pro ($0.15 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-6.1 Sol ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
Qwen3.5-9BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
vs $10.00 vs $0.15 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.5-9B is 66.7x cheaper.

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro or Qwen3.5-9B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-6.1 Sol Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-6.1 Sol Pro has none yet; Qwen3.5-9B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6.1 Sol Pro not benchmarked, Qwen3.5-9B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-6.1 Sol Pro $10.00 against Qwen3.5-9B $0.15 per million output tokens, 66.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-6.1 Sol Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5-9B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol Pro and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.5-9BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured23.5Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
SciCodeNot measured29.5%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured24.2%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured9.2%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol Pro and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.5-9BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured13.3Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured139.3Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol Pro and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.5-9BLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured86.8%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol Pro and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.5-9BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.6%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.9%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured79.0%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol Pro and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.5-9BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured61.7%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol Pro and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.5-9BLeader
IFBenchNot measured66.7%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured70.0%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
DTBenchNot measured71.2%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
LMCANot measured24.5%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro$0.0070Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-9B$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro$0.130Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-9B$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro$0.500Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-9B$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6.1 Sol Pro and Qwen3.5-9B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.5-9B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2026March 10, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.10
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.15
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol Pro better than Qwen3.5-9B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-6.1 Sol Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol Pro or Qwen3.5-9B?

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-9B costs $0.10 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Sol Pro or Qwen3.5-9B?

GPT-6.1 Sol Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-6.1 Sol Pro and Qwen3.5-9B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-6.1 Sol Pro has none yet; Qwen3.5-9B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next