Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro vs Sonar

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.6 Sol ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
SonarPerplexity
Coding
No data
Overall
7.7
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $20.00 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Sonar is 20.0x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 127K tokens.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has results on WeirdML, APEX-Agents and SimpleBench; Sonar on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro not benchmarked, Sonar not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro $20.00 against Sonar $1.00 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Sonar 127K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProSonarLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.5%Only Sonar measured
WeirdML89.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProSonarLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.7Only Sonar measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProSonarLeader
APEX-Agents51.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProSonarLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.1%Only Sonar measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.9%Only Sonar measured
SimpleBench71.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Chess puzzles68.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProSonarLeader
FrontierMath, tier 480.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProSonarLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.9%Only Sonar measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProSonarLeader
DTBench96.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
LMCA59.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro$0.014Fits in one request
Sonar$0.0015Fits in one request

Sonar costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro$0.260Fits in one request
Sonar$0.053Fits in one request

Sonar costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro$1.00Fits in one request
Sonar$0.210Exceeds the context window

Sonar costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol ProPerplexity Sonar
MakerOpenAIPerplexity
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 9, 2026January 27, 2025
Context window1.05M127K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$20.00$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.6 Sol Pro better than Sonar for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 127K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol Pro or Sonar?

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Sonar costs $1.00 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol Pro or Sonar?

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 127K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Sonar?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has results on WeirdML, APEX-Agents and SimpleBench; Sonar on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next