Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.3-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs 29.8x less per output token than GPT-5.3-Codex ($0.47 vs $14.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI
Coding
60.0
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$14.00
Qwen3.8 Omni FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.47
vs $14.00 vs $0.47 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 29.8x cheaper.

GPT-5.3-Codex or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which to pick

Only GPT-5.3-Codex has a coding score, 60.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash for output tokens 29.8x cheaper ($0.47 vs $14.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 400K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.3-Codex has results on LMArena WebDev, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI); Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.3-Codex 60.0 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.3-Codex $14.00 against Qwen3.8 Omni Flash $0.47 per million output tokens, 29.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.3-Codex takes 400K tokens, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexQwen3.8 Omni FlashLeader
LMArena WebDev1407Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
IOI (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench78.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
WeirdML79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1655.2Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: React1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1422Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1443Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexQwen3.8 Omni FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index32.5Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Epoch Capabilities Index157.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexQwen3.8 Omni FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1032Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps983Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1053Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1084Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1124Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
τ²-Bench Telecom86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
METR time horizons74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,940Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexQwen3.8 Omni FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexQwen3.8 Omni FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1162Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1134Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1161Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1164Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: 3D1007Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1144Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: SVG1129Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1152Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexQwen3.8 Omni FlashLeader
IFBench75.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.0088Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.130Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash$0.0089Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.490Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash$0.035Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.3-CodexQwen3.8 Omni Flash
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 24, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.75$0.15
Output $/Mtok$14.00$0.47
Coding index60.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.59Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.3-Codex better than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash for coding?

Only GPT-5.3-Codex has a coding score, 60.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash for output tokens 29.8x cheaper ($0.47 vs $14.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 400K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3-Codex or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

GPT-5.3-Codex costs $1.75 per million input tokens and $14.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.15 and $0.47. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.3-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.3-Codex or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, with 1M tokens against 400K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.3-Codex has results on LMArena WebDev, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI); Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next