Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs 2.3x less per output token than GPT-5.2 Chat ($6.00 vs $14.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.2 ChatOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$14.00
Mixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
5.7
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $14.00 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is 2.3x cheaper.

GPT-5.2 Chat or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5.2 Chat for a larger context window (128K against 66K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.2 Chat has none yet; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and Epoch Capabilities Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.2 Chat not benchmarked, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.2 Chat $14.00 against Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.2 Chat takes 128K tokens, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 66K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.2 Chat and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ChatMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.8%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.2 Chat and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ChatMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured5.7Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured122.0Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.2 Chat and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ChatMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.2%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.0%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.2 Chat and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ChatMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured53.7%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.2 Chat and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ChatMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
DTBenchNot measured55.1%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.2 Chat$0.0088Fits in one request
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.0050Fits in one request

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.2 Chat$0.130Fits in one request
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.118Fits in one request

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.2 Chat$0.490Exceeds the context window
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.2 Chat and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.2 ChatMistral Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 10, 2025April 17, 2024
Context window128K66K
Input $/Mtok$1.75$2.00
Output $/Mtok$14.00$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.2 Chat better than Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.2 Chat for a larger context window (128K against 66K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Chat or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

GPT-5.2 Chat costs $1.75 per million input tokens and $14.00 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.2 Chat or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

GPT-5.2 Chat, with 128K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.2 Chat and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.2 Chat has none yet; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and Epoch Capabilities Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next