Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Phi 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 11 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
23.7
Output $/M
$10.00
11
Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
0
vs boards won of 11 shared

Decision reading

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Phi 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Phi 4 has the edge where output tokens cost 71.4x less.

Shared results
11
GPT-5.1-Codex only
15
Phi 4 only
34
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Phi 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 83.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GPT-5.1-Codex 83.0% against Phi 4 0.0%, 83.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Phi 4 $0.14 per million output tokens, 71.4x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Phi 4 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-CodexBarsPhi 4Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Math20
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards110
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
SWE-bench Verified66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev1337Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%23.1%GPT-5.1-Codex
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%3.8%GPT-5.1-Codex
Terminal-Bench57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1244.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1231Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1228Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1346Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.75.9GPT-5.1-Codex
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured130.5Only Phi 4 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1018Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.0%0.0%GPT-5.1-Codex
BALROGNot measured11.6%Only Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%57.5%GPT-5.1-Codex
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.7%3.8%GPT-5.1-Codex
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured56.1%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1220Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1203Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1230Only Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
AA Math Index95.718.0GPT-5.1-Codex
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)95.7%18.0%GPT-5.1-Codex
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured13.8%Only Phi 4 measured
MATH level 5Not measured64.9%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1246Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1254Only Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%71.4%GPT-5.1-Codex
MMLUNot measured84.8%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1206Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1202Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1241Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1199Only Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
Design Arena: websites1162Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1237Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1138Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1213Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1152Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
IFBench70.0%23.5%GPT-5.1-Codex
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%0.0%GPT-5.1-Codex
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured62.6%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1217Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1201Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1181Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1231Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1197Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1212Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1222Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1158Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1151Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1224Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1234Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1209Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1206Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1217Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1198Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1162Only Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPhi 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex and Phi 4
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-CodexMicrosoft Phi 4
MakerOpenAIMicrosoft
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025January 10, 2025
Context window400K16K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.07
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.14
Coding index15.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.892Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Phi 4 for coding?

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Phi 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Phi 4 has the edge where output tokens cost 71.4x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Phi 4?

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Phi 4 costs $0.07 and $0.14. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Phi 4?

GPT-5.1-Codex, with 400K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex vs Phi 4 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Phi 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next