Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs 4.3x less per output token than GPT-4o ($2.34 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
14
vs boards won of 14 shared

GPT-4o or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
14
GPT-4o only
13
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
51
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 70.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GPT-4o 25.1% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 95.6%, 70.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o $10.00 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4oBarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Web design06
General04
All shared boards014
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
SWE-bench Verified38.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Lite38.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)18.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Multimodal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)30.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SciCodeNot measured44.8%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%40.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
ALE-BenchNot measured621.9Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1464Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1388Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1410Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured21.4Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.8Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom25.1%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
APEX-AgentsNot measured24.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
GDPval9.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)54.3%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.4%29.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.4%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ARC-AGI4.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1448Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1450Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1453Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1454Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
MMLU88.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websites8311190Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: UI components8831161Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: game dev9061140Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: data viz8581175Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: 3D8681160Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: all code categories8601179Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
IFBench34.3%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.3%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
DTBench64.5%87.5%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMCA16.6%37.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena TextNot measured1437Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1424Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1402Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1443Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1498Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1445Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1429Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1446Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1415Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1399Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4oQwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024February 16, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.39
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.34
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GPT-4o costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next