Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o vs Qwen3 14B

Qwen3 14B costs 43.5x less per output token than GPT-4o ($0.23 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
3
Qwen3 14BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
9
vs boards won of 12 shared

GPT-4o or Qwen3 14B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o for a larger context window (128K against 41K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
12
GPT-4o only
15
Qwen3 14B only
8
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o not benchmarked, Qwen3 14B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 52.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: GPT-4o 6.0 against Qwen3 14B 58.0, 52.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o $10.00 against Qwen3 14B $0.23 per million output tokens, 43.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o takes 128K tokens, Qwen3 14B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4oBarsQwen3 14BTies
Coding11
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General22
All shared boards39
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
SWE-bench Verified38.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Lite38.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)18.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Multimodal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)30.9%52.3%Qwen3 14B
SciCodeNot measured30.7%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%5.3%GPT-4o
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured6.7Only Qwen3 14B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured138.2Only Qwen3 14B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom25.1%34.5%Qwen3 14B
GDPval9.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)54.3%60.4%Qwen3 14B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.4%4.5%Qwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured63.8%Only Qwen3 14B measured
ARC-AGI4.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured49.1%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
AA Math Index6.058.0Qwen3 14B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%58.0%Qwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured66.4%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%77.4%Qwen3 14B
MMLU88.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
Design Arena: websites831Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: UI components885Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: game dev906Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: data viz858Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: 3D869Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: all code categories861Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
General benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
IFBench34.3%40.5%Qwen3 14B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.3%0.0%GPT-4o
DTBench64.5%64.0%GPT-4o
LMCA16.6%18.2%Qwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured62.5%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 14BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 14B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0062Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 14B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 14B$0.024Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 14B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o and Qwen3 14B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4oQwen3 14B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024April 28, 2025
Context window128K41K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.11
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.23
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o better than Qwen3 14B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o for a larger context window (128K against 41K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Qwen3 14B?

GPT-4o costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B costs $0.11 and $0.23. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o or Qwen3 14B?

GPT-4o, with 128K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o vs Qwen3 14B comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 14B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next