Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash costs 4.6x less per output token than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) ($0.13 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Qwen3.7 FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.13
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Qwen3.7 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for work measured by GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) or Mystery game puzzles, where it leads.

Shared results
4
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
42
Qwen3.7 Flash only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 49.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9% against Qwen3.7 Flash 86.7%, 79.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against Qwen3.7 Flash $0.13 per million output tokens, 4.6x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.7 Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)BarsQwen3.7 FlashTies
Reasoning02
Math02
All shared boards04
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
WeirdML11.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured420.1Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured144.1Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%82.3%Qwen3.7 Flash
SimpleBench10.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzles12.0%15.0%Qwen3.7 Flash
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: expert1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%86.7%Qwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%19.3%Qwen3.7 Flash
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1271Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
SimpleQA Verified8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1305Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1258Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1268Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision1066Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1266Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: German1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1216Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: French1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1276Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1275Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1244Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1253Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1033Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0001Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0019Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.7 Flash$0.0073Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 Flash
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024July 27, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.03
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.13
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than Qwen3.7 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for work measured by GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) or Mystery game puzzles, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Qwen3.7 Flash?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03 and $0.13. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Qwen3.7 Flash comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next