Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) leads Mixtral 8x22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.3 to 5.7, and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs 2.5x less per output token ($6.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
4
Mixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
1
vs boards won of 5 shared

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for a larger context window (128K against 66K tokens) and work measured by Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
5
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
39
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct only
3
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 20.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 74.0% against Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 53.7%, 20.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 against Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) takes 128K tokens, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 66K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-05-13)BarsMixtral 8x22B InstructTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning11
Knowledge10
All shared boards41
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index24.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)33.4%14.8%GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
LMArena Text: coding1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
SciCodeNot measured0.0%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.35.7GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured122.0Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
METR time horizons40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROG32.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.6%33.2%GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)1.8%4.0%Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1281Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: expert1250Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1293Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 551.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.0%53.7%GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
MMLU84.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science1295Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1314Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1262Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
DTBenchNot measured55.1%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1300Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision1137Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: English1312Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: German1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: French1304Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1292Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1365Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1302Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1288Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1298Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: English1147Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1132Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.0050Fits in one request

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.118Fits in one request

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mistral Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024April 17, 2024
Context window128K66K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$15.00$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-05-13) better than Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for a larger context window (128K against 66K tokens) and work measured by Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13), with 128K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next