Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads GPT-4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.9 to 6.7, and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 31.6x less per output token ($1.90 vs $60.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$60.00
0
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
32
vs boards won of 32 shared

GPT-4 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
32
GPT-4 only
13
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
17
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4 not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 41.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Korean: GPT-4 1087 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 1394, 51.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4 $60.00 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 31.6x apart.
Context window
GPT-4 takes 8K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4BarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge05
General018
All shared boards032
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified22.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench Lite39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench (full test set)12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
AA Coding Index13.1Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.4%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding12091438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT11951442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.79.9Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index125.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured54.1%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)34.9%77.2%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.9%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12001428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert11491442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12091439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
GSM8K92.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: math12301425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12281419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)56.2%83.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MMLU86.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge96.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: science11771444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11451431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government11911438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance11451433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench33.2%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured63.7%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
DTBench62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMCA17.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
HellaSwag95.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
WinoGrande87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text12061420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following12011406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing11911366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English12201429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English11941405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese11841463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German11981424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese11371385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean10871394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French12201452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish11971428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian11951408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish12651419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn12061428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries11901419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language12191392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11841368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4$0.060Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4$1.68Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4$6.60Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2023September 23, 2025
Context window8K262K
Input $/Mtok$30.00$0.21
Output $/Mtok$60.00$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT-4 costs $30.00 per million input tokens and $60.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next