Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs 5.0x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo ($0.30 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
Mistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $1.50 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 5.0x cheaper.

GPT-3.5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3.2 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index; Mistral Small 3.2 24B on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.2 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 against Mistral Small 3.2 24B $0.30 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo takes 16K tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 24B 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
AA Coding Index10.7Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.5Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
GPQA Diamond30.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
GSM8K57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured896Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured889Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured929Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
DTBench48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMCA9.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0003Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0059Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.023Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.2 24B
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2023June 20, 2025
Context window16K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo better than Mistral Small 3.2 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B, with 256K tokens against 16K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index; Mistral Small 3.2 24B on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next