Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs 2.7x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo ($0.555 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
vs $1.50 vs $0.555 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 2.7x cheaper.

GPT-3.5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo takes 16K tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AA Coding Index10.7Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1309Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1301Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.5Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
GPQA Diamond30.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1278Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1257Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1290Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1119Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1158Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
GSM8K57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1261Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1271Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1265Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1267Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1271Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1257Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
DTBench48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMCA9.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena TextNot measured1277Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1263Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1252Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1136Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1295Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1255Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1253Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1266Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1208Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1207Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1273Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1284Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1263Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1242Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1270Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1299Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1268Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1250Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1157Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1132Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1142Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1153Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1123Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 TurboMistral Small 3.1 24B
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2023March 17, 2025
Context window16K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.351
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.555
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo better than Mistral Small 3.1 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 and $0.555. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B, with 128K tokens against 16K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next