Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiniMax M2

MiniMax M2 leads GPT-3.5 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.6 to 5.5, and MiniMax M2 costs 1.5x less per output token ($1.02 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

GPT-3.5 Turbo or MiniMax M2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
GPT-3.5 Turbo only
10
MiniMax M2 only
47
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 48.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-3.5 Turbo 29.7% against MiniMax M2 77.7%, 48.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo takes 16K tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-3.5 TurboBarsMiniMax M2Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Knowledge01
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured61.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1297Only MiniMax M2 measured
AA Coding Index10.7Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.6%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured30.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1371Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1373Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1306Only MiniMax M2 measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.518.6MiniMax M2
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured86.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$161Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
GPQA Diamond30.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.7%77.7%MiniMax M2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.7%Only MiniMax M2 measured
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1338Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1376Only MiniMax M2 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured57.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured78.3Only MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
GSM8K57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1351Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1368Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%82.0%MiniMax M2
MMLU68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1348Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1367Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1349Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1143Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1134Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1118Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1140Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1098Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1135Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1100Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
IFBenchNot measured72.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured64.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
DTBench48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMCA9.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena TextNot measured1340Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1329Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1286Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1364Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1313Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1366Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1326Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1330Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1312Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1361Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1331Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1295Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1298Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiniMax M2
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 TurboMiniMax M2
MakerOpenAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2023October 23, 2025
Context window16K205K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.255
Output $/Mtok$1.50$1.02
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.702
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo better than MiniMax M2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or MiniMax M2?

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo or MiniMax M2?

MiniMax M2, with 205K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-3.5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next